The author says those who often claim to be tolerant are tolerant of those who agree with them – which is no one’s definition of tolerance.

So evil can’t exist unless good exists. But good can’t exist unless God exists. In other words, there can be no objective evil unless there is objective good, and there can be no objective good unless God exists. If evil is real – and we all know it is – then God exists.

To say that a scientist can disprove the existence of God is like saying a mechanic can disprove the existence of Henry Ford. It doesn’t follow.

The God the new atheists reject is not the actual God of the Bible.

Atheists must make a positive case that only material things exist. That’s why instead of debating “Does God exist?” I prefer to debate the question “What better explains reality: atheism or theism?

If there is no objective morality then love is no better than murder.

The author concedes that humanity had the fatal tendency to shape truth to our beliefs rather than beliefs to the Truth.

Atheists have had to resort to wild speculations to give chance more of a chance.

The author says those who often claim to be tolerant are tolerant of those who agree with them – which is no one's definition of tolerance.